Little White Lies (Les Petits Mouchoirs) (2010)
Director: Guillaume Canet
Duration: 154 mins
Rating: ****
Every year, Max invites all of his friends to his holiday home in Bordeaux. He resents that his success as a restaurant owner has led them to rely on him so much and can never truly relax. Just before leaving, one of the friends is hit by a lorry on his way home from a nightclub and it looks like the holiday may be called off. But deciding that there’s nothing more they could do for him in Paris, they set off for their relaxing break. The group’s relationships are tested to the full and all of the little white lies they’ve been telling each other start to creep through the gaps.
The setting for the film is simply beautiful; the beach lodge where the group stay on a Bordeaux beach in southwest France is to die for. In addition, the soundtrack is lovely and is thankfully available to buy.
This film is a great success for French cinema, which seems to be growing from strength to strength; you only have to look at the triumph of films like Amélie (2001) and La Marche de l’Empereur (March of the Penguins - 2004) to see that francophone films are becoming more popular for mainstream viewing. If you enjoy French cinema, look out for Les Aventures Extraordinaires d’Adele Blanc-Sec, which is showing at the Tyneside Cinema now. From previews, it looks like it’ll be a thrilling watch, albeit with a hint of The Mummy.
03 May 2011
'The Eagle' reviewed by Simon Howard
The Eagle (12A)
Running Time: 114 mins
Director: Kevin Macdonald
Cast: Channing Tatum, Jamie Bell, Mark Strong, Donald Sutherland
Rating: ***** (3 stars)
Channing Tatum and Jamie Bell take the lead roles in this adaptation of Rosemary Sutcliff’s classic novel ‘The Eagle of the Ninth’. Set in 2nd Century Roman Britain, the story tells the tale of a master and slave who embark on a perilous quest beyond the edges of the known world.
Marcus Aquila (Tatum) arrives in Britain determined to restore the tarnished reputation of his father Flavius. Twenty years before the film begins, Flavius had marched a 5,000 strong army into Caledonia and never returned. The outcome of this saw the Roman Emperor Hadrian build a wall to seal off their territory- Hadrian’s Wall.
Upon hearing a rumour that his father’s golden emblem, the Eagle of the Ninth, has been seen in a tribal temple in the far north, Marcus sets off with a Esca (Bell), a slave he befriends at a gladiatorial contest, across Hadrian’s Wall.
As Marcus’s slave navigates him through the region, he realises the mystery of his father’s disappearance may well be linked to his own slave’s identity and loyalty.
Filmed in the Scottish highlands, the scenery and landscapes are beautifully shot and add a real epic feel to the film. The vast wilderness is made to feel savage and dangerous at every turn, especially when the duo come face to face with the warriors of the fearsome Seal Prince.
The numerous action sequences are impressive and the lack of CGI makes for a refreshing change. There is an intriguing focus throughout on the interplay of pride, loyalty and masculinity. The historical element does sometimes begin to tire but for those interested in Roman Britain it is a fascinating insight.
Verdict:
Channing Tatum proves he is more than just a pretty face and his relationship with Jamie Bell is a likeable pairing. Whilst the film is unlikely to be remembered as a classic in years to come, as an action-adventure it is a commendable effort which entertains for most of its lengthy running time.
Running Time: 114 mins
Director: Kevin Macdonald
Cast: Channing Tatum, Jamie Bell, Mark Strong, Donald Sutherland
Rating: ***** (3 stars)
Channing Tatum and Jamie Bell take the lead roles in this adaptation of Rosemary Sutcliff’s classic novel ‘The Eagle of the Ninth’. Set in 2nd Century Roman Britain, the story tells the tale of a master and slave who embark on a perilous quest beyond the edges of the known world.
Marcus Aquila (Tatum) arrives in Britain determined to restore the tarnished reputation of his father Flavius. Twenty years before the film begins, Flavius had marched a 5,000 strong army into Caledonia and never returned. The outcome of this saw the Roman Emperor Hadrian build a wall to seal off their territory- Hadrian’s Wall.
Upon hearing a rumour that his father’s golden emblem, the Eagle of the Ninth, has been seen in a tribal temple in the far north, Marcus sets off with a Esca (Bell), a slave he befriends at a gladiatorial contest, across Hadrian’s Wall.
As Marcus’s slave navigates him through the region, he realises the mystery of his father’s disappearance may well be linked to his own slave’s identity and loyalty.
Filmed in the Scottish highlands, the scenery and landscapes are beautifully shot and add a real epic feel to the film. The vast wilderness is made to feel savage and dangerous at every turn, especially when the duo come face to face with the warriors of the fearsome Seal Prince.
The numerous action sequences are impressive and the lack of CGI makes for a refreshing change. There is an intriguing focus throughout on the interplay of pride, loyalty and masculinity. The historical element does sometimes begin to tire but for those interested in Roman Britain it is a fascinating insight.
Verdict:
Channing Tatum proves he is more than just a pretty face and his relationship with Jamie Bell is a likeable pairing. Whilst the film is unlikely to be remembered as a classic in years to come, as an action-adventure it is a commendable effort which entertains for most of its lengthy running time.
25 March 2011
'You Will Meet a Tall Dark Stranger' Reviewed by Jess Cree
Director: Woody Allen
Duration: 98 mins
Rating: **
I should have loved this film; it has a multi-award winning script writer and director and a great cast. But something just didn’t click. The storyline is predictable, the actors never truly seem at ease with their characters and the whole thing seems like it’s going to go full circle, but then doesn’t, which left me feeling irritated. Let me explain further...
The story is of a mother and daughter duo, both of whom have failing marriages. Helena (Gemma Jones) is Sally’s (Naomi Watts) deranged mother, who is struggling to cope with the fact that her husband (Anthony Hopkins) has left her and traded her in for a younger, newer model. Charmaine (Lucy Foxx) plays the typical gold digging ex-prostitute, who marries Alfie in the hope that he won’t be around for much longer. Perhaps an interesting fact here might stop you from falling asleep at this point in the story. The role of Charmaine was supposed to be played by Nicole Kidman, who had to turn the part down because of other commitments. I think it was a lucky escape to be honest.
Moving over to Sally’s story; she has recently started working at an art gallery and considers having an affair with her boss (Antonio Banderas), who instead falls for her friend (Anna Friel). Her husband Roy (Josh Brolin) is a failed writer and starts meeting up with the Lady in Red (Frieda Pinto) across the way, who he spies on from his window. So everything has fallen apart.
Drawing towards the end of the film, I was expecting some sort of conclusion, but it never really arrived. The mad mother keeps wittering on about her psychic and the ending is pretty abrupt. We find out about the mother’s new love interest, but the other characters seem to just fade away along with their dissatisfaction in their life choices.
I really did have high hopes for the film as it began. The soundtrack was enjoyable and the filming and set were actually rather nice. But it wasn’t just the storyline I had a problem with. The script was forced and repetitive and the narrator seemed to play a pointless part. The jokes were only funny if you were fifty plus and despite the cast being very well-known and successful, the acting was mediocre. I heard one viewer say that this was the best Woody Allen film to be released in years. I sincerely disagree.
Duration: 98 mins
Rating: **
I should have loved this film; it has a multi-award winning script writer and director and a great cast. But something just didn’t click. The storyline is predictable, the actors never truly seem at ease with their characters and the whole thing seems like it’s going to go full circle, but then doesn’t, which left me feeling irritated. Let me explain further...
The story is of a mother and daughter duo, both of whom have failing marriages. Helena (Gemma Jones) is Sally’s (Naomi Watts) deranged mother, who is struggling to cope with the fact that her husband (Anthony Hopkins) has left her and traded her in for a younger, newer model. Charmaine (Lucy Foxx) plays the typical gold digging ex-prostitute, who marries Alfie in the hope that he won’t be around for much longer. Perhaps an interesting fact here might stop you from falling asleep at this point in the story. The role of Charmaine was supposed to be played by Nicole Kidman, who had to turn the part down because of other commitments. I think it was a lucky escape to be honest.
Moving over to Sally’s story; she has recently started working at an art gallery and considers having an affair with her boss (Antonio Banderas), who instead falls for her friend (Anna Friel). Her husband Roy (Josh Brolin) is a failed writer and starts meeting up with the Lady in Red (Frieda Pinto) across the way, who he spies on from his window. So everything has fallen apart.
Drawing towards the end of the film, I was expecting some sort of conclusion, but it never really arrived. The mad mother keeps wittering on about her psychic and the ending is pretty abrupt. We find out about the mother’s new love interest, but the other characters seem to just fade away along with their dissatisfaction in their life choices.
I really did have high hopes for the film as it began. The soundtrack was enjoyable and the filming and set were actually rather nice. But it wasn’t just the storyline I had a problem with. The script was forced and repetitive and the narrator seemed to play a pointless part. The jokes were only funny if you were fifty plus and despite the cast being very well-known and successful, the acting was mediocre. I heard one viewer say that this was the best Woody Allen film to be released in years. I sincerely disagree.
02 March 2011
'The King's Speech' Reviewed by Simon Howard
The King’s Speech (12A) 118 mins
Director: Tom Hooper
Cast: Colin Firth, Geoffrey Rush, Helena Bonham Carter, Timothy Spall
Rating: ***** (5 stars)
By Simon Howard
The story of King George VI and his stammer may be perceived by many as a dull and un-interesting subject matter for a Hollywood hit. But the film on everybody’s lips since its release in early January has been The King’s Speech. At the Kodak Theater in Los Angeles, it was rewarded with a staggering FOUR Oscar’s, for Best Picture, Director, Actor and Original Screenplay. In a year where several great films were released (The Social Network and Inception are modern classics) it was this heart warming British drama which stood out above all others.
Set at a time when radio and newsreels were on the rise, and the public could now listen to their leaders, the story is a simple and beautiful one, of friendship and overcoming adversity. After the death of his father King George V and the scandalous abdication of his brother King Edward VIII, Bertie is suddenly crowned as King George VI..With the country on the brink of war and in desperate need of a leader, his wife Elizabeth (the future Queen Mother) arranges for the King to see eccentric speech therapist Lionel Logue to cure his life-long speech impediment.
It is the relationship between the King and his Australian therapist which stands out above all others. The complexities of their personalities mean the clash between the unstoppable force of Logue and the immovable object of the King is an intriguing and delightful duel throughout. Great pleasure is taken in seeing the pair develop from initially distrusting and disliking one another to relying on each other as friends, when he is thrust onto the throne and World War II begins.
Colin Firth gives a masterful performance, one full of passion and commitment- the way he was able to teach himself to obtain a stammer is nothing short of remarkable. He powerfully conveys the agony his stutter causes him, as well as his conviction that by not being able to master it he is not living up to his royal obligations.
Rush is delightful with his unorthodox and controversial methods (those are the King’s least favourite words), and his playful teasing. His insistence on calling His Majesty ‘Bertie’ creates great humour and camaraderie. Logue is a man who at the same time must cure his own demons, with his sense of failure coming from never having made it as a professional actor.
An all-star cast supports the two leads. Helena Bonham Carter was unfortunate not to receive an Oscar of her own for her commanding performance as the robustly supportive Elizabeth, but she is not the only one who emerges with credit. Timothy Spall is excellent as future Prime Minister Winston Churchill; Michael Gambon’s appearance is all too brief as George V, whilst Guy Pearce brings life to the abdicating brother.
Director Tom Hooper is a well-renowned storyteller, who brings intelligence, variety and pace to this traditional story, as he has done in the past with The Damned United. He keeps the audience fully engaged and ensures the King’s dilemma never feels anything less than real.
Stylishly produced throughout, it left me, like so many others, leaving the cinema proud to be British! A stunning and hugely enjoyable triumph which is fully deserving of all the awards it has had lavished upon it.
Director: Tom Hooper
Cast: Colin Firth, Geoffrey Rush, Helena Bonham Carter, Timothy Spall
Rating: ***** (5 stars)
By Simon Howard
The story of King George VI and his stammer may be perceived by many as a dull and un-interesting subject matter for a Hollywood hit. But the film on everybody’s lips since its release in early January has been The King’s Speech. At the Kodak Theater in Los Angeles, it was rewarded with a staggering FOUR Oscar’s, for Best Picture, Director, Actor and Original Screenplay. In a year where several great films were released (The Social Network and Inception are modern classics) it was this heart warming British drama which stood out above all others.
Set at a time when radio and newsreels were on the rise, and the public could now listen to their leaders, the story is a simple and beautiful one, of friendship and overcoming adversity. After the death of his father King George V and the scandalous abdication of his brother King Edward VIII, Bertie is suddenly crowned as King George VI..With the country on the brink of war and in desperate need of a leader, his wife Elizabeth (the future Queen Mother) arranges for the King to see eccentric speech therapist Lionel Logue to cure his life-long speech impediment.
It is the relationship between the King and his Australian therapist which stands out above all others. The complexities of their personalities mean the clash between the unstoppable force of Logue and the immovable object of the King is an intriguing and delightful duel throughout. Great pleasure is taken in seeing the pair develop from initially distrusting and disliking one another to relying on each other as friends, when he is thrust onto the throne and World War II begins.
Colin Firth gives a masterful performance, one full of passion and commitment- the way he was able to teach himself to obtain a stammer is nothing short of remarkable. He powerfully conveys the agony his stutter causes him, as well as his conviction that by not being able to master it he is not living up to his royal obligations.
Rush is delightful with his unorthodox and controversial methods (those are the King’s least favourite words), and his playful teasing. His insistence on calling His Majesty ‘Bertie’ creates great humour and camaraderie. Logue is a man who at the same time must cure his own demons, with his sense of failure coming from never having made it as a professional actor.
An all-star cast supports the two leads. Helena Bonham Carter was unfortunate not to receive an Oscar of her own for her commanding performance as the robustly supportive Elizabeth, but she is not the only one who emerges with credit. Timothy Spall is excellent as future Prime Minister Winston Churchill; Michael Gambon’s appearance is all too brief as George V, whilst Guy Pearce brings life to the abdicating brother.
Director Tom Hooper is a well-renowned storyteller, who brings intelligence, variety and pace to this traditional story, as he has done in the past with The Damned United. He keeps the audience fully engaged and ensures the King’s dilemma never feels anything less than real.
Stylishly produced throughout, it left me, like so many others, leaving the cinema proud to be British! A stunning and hugely enjoyable triumph which is fully deserving of all the awards it has had lavished upon it.
'The Fighter' Reviewed by Simon Howard
The Fighter (15) 115 mins
Director: David O. Russell
Cast: Mark Wahlberg, Christian Bale, Amy Adams, Melissa Leo
Rating: ***** (5 stars)
By Simon Howard
Based upon the true story of Irish fighter Micky Ward’s unlikely road to the world light-welterweight title, this double-Oscar winning film is both inspiring and harrowing in equal amounts. The film is about an underdog finally getting his break but also about addiction, and how it affects the people around them. Set in early 90’s America, the film revolves around a dysfunctional family being drawn together by an against-the-odds boxing triumph.
Set in the run-down town of Lowell, Massachusetts, we discover Micky Ward’s boxing career has stalled after early success. He is divorced with limited access to his child, and is now being used as a stepping stone for other boxers on their way to the top. But if his case is bad, it’s nothing compared to his half-brother Dicky. This womanising, drunken crack-head goes around calling himself the ‘Pride of Lowell’, and can do no wrong in his mother’s eyes. Melissa Leo plays Alice, a domineering woman who convinces her sons that they owe everything to her management. She won the Oscar for Best Supporting Actress and is enthralling as the delusional mother trying to keep her family together. What becomes clear very early on is that Micky’s brother and mother are huge stumbling blocks preventing his career from progressing.
Mark Wahlberg began training for the role of Micky four years before filming eventually began. In the impressive boxing scenes it becomes clear that all his hard work has paid off; they are some of the most believable sporting scenes in movie history. His role is perhaps the most complex of all, as he battles with his unbreakable devotion to his family and his ambition to be a success in the ring. He is vulnerable and suffers rather than upsetting the people around him to get what he wants, until he grows with the help of a woman by his side.
That woman is Amy Adams, who plays a crucial role as Micky’s girlfriend Charlene in making him stand up for himself and find out what he really wants from his misguided life. She’s a spirited woman who gives as good as she gets.
Christian Bale is the real star of the show as Micky’s half-brother Dickie Eklund, a drug addict who had previously been a boxer himself. His claim to fame is that he knocked down Sugar Ray Leonard (a fact which he doesn’t allow us to forget). Dicky is so detached from the real picture of what is going on, and is oblivious to the damage his addiction is doing to his life (he has a film crew following him making a documentary on drug addiction but believes it is about his boxing comeback), that it takes the audience through a whole range of emotions. Despite this he is a warm and energetic character, one who you can understand Micky sticking with despite all his problems. This is Bale at his finest, and he undoubtedly deserved the Oscar for Best Supporting Actor- it is a performance which will live long in the memory.
Perhaps what makes the film resonate so strongly with audiences is the fact that nobody in the film is painted in an entirely positive light. Nobody is perfect and everybody has their faults. The film has a lot of heart, and can be quite funny at times. All the actors are on top form and captivate with their performances. Yes, the ending is predictable, but for a boxing film this is perhaps as good as it gets. Ultimately, it packs a real punch.
Director: David O. Russell
Cast: Mark Wahlberg, Christian Bale, Amy Adams, Melissa Leo
Rating: ***** (5 stars)
By Simon Howard
Based upon the true story of Irish fighter Micky Ward’s unlikely road to the world light-welterweight title, this double-Oscar winning film is both inspiring and harrowing in equal amounts. The film is about an underdog finally getting his break but also about addiction, and how it affects the people around them. Set in early 90’s America, the film revolves around a dysfunctional family being drawn together by an against-the-odds boxing triumph.
Set in the run-down town of Lowell, Massachusetts, we discover Micky Ward’s boxing career has stalled after early success. He is divorced with limited access to his child, and is now being used as a stepping stone for other boxers on their way to the top. But if his case is bad, it’s nothing compared to his half-brother Dicky. This womanising, drunken crack-head goes around calling himself the ‘Pride of Lowell’, and can do no wrong in his mother’s eyes. Melissa Leo plays Alice, a domineering woman who convinces her sons that they owe everything to her management. She won the Oscar for Best Supporting Actress and is enthralling as the delusional mother trying to keep her family together. What becomes clear very early on is that Micky’s brother and mother are huge stumbling blocks preventing his career from progressing.
Mark Wahlberg began training for the role of Micky four years before filming eventually began. In the impressive boxing scenes it becomes clear that all his hard work has paid off; they are some of the most believable sporting scenes in movie history. His role is perhaps the most complex of all, as he battles with his unbreakable devotion to his family and his ambition to be a success in the ring. He is vulnerable and suffers rather than upsetting the people around him to get what he wants, until he grows with the help of a woman by his side.
That woman is Amy Adams, who plays a crucial role as Micky’s girlfriend Charlene in making him stand up for himself and find out what he really wants from his misguided life. She’s a spirited woman who gives as good as she gets.
Christian Bale is the real star of the show as Micky’s half-brother Dickie Eklund, a drug addict who had previously been a boxer himself. His claim to fame is that he knocked down Sugar Ray Leonard (a fact which he doesn’t allow us to forget). Dicky is so detached from the real picture of what is going on, and is oblivious to the damage his addiction is doing to his life (he has a film crew following him making a documentary on drug addiction but believes it is about his boxing comeback), that it takes the audience through a whole range of emotions. Despite this he is a warm and energetic character, one who you can understand Micky sticking with despite all his problems. This is Bale at his finest, and he undoubtedly deserved the Oscar for Best Supporting Actor- it is a performance which will live long in the memory.
Perhaps what makes the film resonate so strongly with audiences is the fact that nobody in the film is painted in an entirely positive light. Nobody is perfect and everybody has their faults. The film has a lot of heart, and can be quite funny at times. All the actors are on top form and captivate with their performances. Yes, the ending is predictable, but for a boxing film this is perhaps as good as it gets. Ultimately, it packs a real punch.
01 March 2011
'Animal Kingdom' Reviewed by Aliena Haig
Rating: 7/10
Don’t be fooled by the title. Animal Kingdom is not a movie about wild animals roaming around, defending their place within their environment. That is only the metaphor on which it is based. Set in Melbourne, Australia, the film tells the chilling story of Joshua Cody’s fight against his family. After the death of his mother due to a heroine overdose, “J” is left surrounded by criminals when moving to live with his family comprising of his diabolical grandmother and his three drug dealing and murdering uncles. When a detective who tries to relieve him from his situation is thrown into the mix, the storyline develops into one of intrigue and tension and the film follows Josh’s survival among the criminal world down under.
Though it is yet another film about good versus evil, it is nothing like a typical Hollywood blockbuster. Directed by David Michod, Animal Kingdom is down to earth and paints a much more realistic and believable picture of what goes on between the villains and the police, focusing on the story behind the events rather than action within them. With moving scenes and a strong dialogue, each member of the cast, including names such as Guy Pearce and Sullivan Stapleton, puts on a great performance. Bringing out a variety of emotions, this film evokes not only anger, but also has you close to tears. With plenty of twists and turns along the way, there are all sorts of surprises and shocks as the truth and the reality of the events begin to be revealed.
Animal Kingdom is Michod’s debut film as a director and it is one to generate discussion. Though it starts slow, the ending is certainly one to remember. If anything however, it is not for the faint hearted. Then again, it’s always about the survival of the fittest.
Don’t be fooled by the title. Animal Kingdom is not a movie about wild animals roaming around, defending their place within their environment. That is only the metaphor on which it is based. Set in Melbourne, Australia, the film tells the chilling story of Joshua Cody’s fight against his family. After the death of his mother due to a heroine overdose, “J” is left surrounded by criminals when moving to live with his family comprising of his diabolical grandmother and his three drug dealing and murdering uncles. When a detective who tries to relieve him from his situation is thrown into the mix, the storyline develops into one of intrigue and tension and the film follows Josh’s survival among the criminal world down under.
Though it is yet another film about good versus evil, it is nothing like a typical Hollywood blockbuster. Directed by David Michod, Animal Kingdom is down to earth and paints a much more realistic and believable picture of what goes on between the villains and the police, focusing on the story behind the events rather than action within them. With moving scenes and a strong dialogue, each member of the cast, including names such as Guy Pearce and Sullivan Stapleton, puts on a great performance. Bringing out a variety of emotions, this film evokes not only anger, but also has you close to tears. With plenty of twists and turns along the way, there are all sorts of surprises and shocks as the truth and the reality of the events begin to be revealed.
Animal Kingdom is Michod’s debut film as a director and it is one to generate discussion. Though it starts slow, the ending is certainly one to remember. If anything however, it is not for the faint hearted. Then again, it’s always about the survival of the fittest.
23 February 2011
'Inside Job' Reviewed by Alex Lennon and Donal McKeown
If you want to see a movie to gain an insight into the recession and how it was caused you should watch this movie. If you want answers to how we are changing in response to the recession this movie isn’t for you.
Thoroughly in-depth information presented in a well constructed documentary movie. It is narrated by Matt Damon, while genuinely enthralling it does not give any comfort to those who lost their money but it does offer some figure heads at whom you can point your finger at. It may be interesting to people who want to know more about the recession like business or economics students. It is quite heavy going, so make sure that you have put your thinking caps on before entering the cinema, it’s not ideal for a lazy Sunday afternoon hangover movie.
The documentary directed by Charles Ferguson who also draws notoriety from his portrayal of the Iraq war in ‘No End In Sight’ gains unrivaled access to key figures within the financial industry as well as the academic world, to offer competing perspectives and therefore a fairer representation of what actually happened.
It is a fantastic documentary that will make you either hate the financial industry or fuel your desire to be part of it. We give this a 4/5 only because as on walking out of the cinema you will feel a sense of helplessness against the banks as you will realise that you are at the mercy of the narcissitic plutocrats.
21 February 2011
True Grit Reviewed by Jessica Cree
Directors: Joel and Ethan Coen
Duration: 110mins
Rating: *****
“The wicked flee when none pursueth” Proverbs 28:1
‘True Grit is’ a remake of the 1969 film directed by Henry Hathaway, which stars one of the greatest actors of all time, John Wayne. So, a huge act to live up to, then, but this film is brilliant – it has taken a large dollop of the Coen Brothers, added some well-known Hollywood stars and topped it off with a sprinkling of new talent; all in all, a recipe for success.
The plot follows 14-year-old Mattie Ross (Hailee Steinfeld), whose father has been murdered by employee Tom Chaney (Josh Brolin). Whilst arranging his affairs, Mattie swears to avenge her father’s death and hires Rooster Cogburn (Jeff Bridges) to take her after the criminal. However, Chaney is also a wanted man in Texas, and so Ranger LeBoeuf (Matt Damon), who has been pursuing the serial killer for months, proposes to team up with the pair to increase their chances of bringing him to justice.
Now, I’m not the world’s greatest fan of this genre of film, and Westerns tend to remind me of long, rainy Sunday afternoons with my Grandad. But I couldn’t ignore the hype this film had been creating and I was really surprised that the Tyneside Cinema was full, despite the film having been released over a week earlier.
‘True Grit’ has been nominated for 10 Oscars in total, but I think that Steinfeld‘s nomination is the most deserved; she played an amazing part and she’s a talent to look out for in the future. However, I disagree that she is a supporting actress; I think she should be up for the Best Actress Gong.
My one criticism of the film is that I didn’t really understand the majority of what Bridges was saying; his accent was really thick and difficult to comprehend.
This is honestly one of the best films I’ve seen in a long time. But don’t take my word for it, make sure you go out and see it.
20 February 2011
Never Let Me Go reviewed by Simon Howard
Never Let Me Go (12A) 103 mins
Director: Mark Romanek
Cast: Keira Knightley, Carey Mulligan, Andrew Garfield
2 stars
By Simon Howard
Following the huge success of Kazuo Ishiguro’s 2005 dystopian novel (which was this year sent to every first year student at Newcastle University), Mark Romanek has brought this moving story onto the big screen with an all-star cast.
As children, Ruth, Kathy and Tommy spend their childhood at a seemingly idyllic English boarding school. As they grow into young adults, they find that they have to come to terms with the strength of the love they feel for each other, while preparing themselves for the haunting reality that awaits them. Without wanting to spoil the film, it is made clear from very early on the twist which means that for the three main characters there will be no happy ending- they have been produced to provide donor organs for transplants, and will die before they can fulfil their potential. It is essentially a sci-fi movie dressed up around a romance.
The film is by all accounts a very graceful and faithful adaptation, which is dealt with in a poignant way. The spirit of the novel is captured well, but in a sense this is part of the problem for many viewers, who will not have read Ishiguro’s work beforehand. One aspect which does stand out is the excellent contrast between the stunning landscapes and panoramas compared with the bleak and monochrome colours- visually it is a thing of beauty.
Garfield, having produced a great performance in ‘The Social Network’ again demonstrates his considerable acting talent and outshines his two more experienced co-stars. Keira Knightley is perhaps the weakest of the three main leads, and this is far from her best performance. The three child actors who take up the story for the first thirty minutes all excel and look to have big futures in the industry, and set the tone well for the final two thirds when Mulligan and co. take the lead.
This is a film which does require a lot of thinking about, as the secrets and details are revealed slowly but surely. What’s missing is a spark of life or a jolt of the unexpected — something beyond tears — to puncture the falseness of a film world, which obscures the tragedy that the three characters, by their nature, cannot express.
Verdict: An altogether unsatisfying experience, which raises more questions than it answers.
Director: Mark Romanek
Cast: Keira Knightley, Carey Mulligan, Andrew Garfield
2 stars
By Simon Howard
Following the huge success of Kazuo Ishiguro’s 2005 dystopian novel (which was this year sent to every first year student at Newcastle University), Mark Romanek has brought this moving story onto the big screen with an all-star cast.
As children, Ruth, Kathy and Tommy spend their childhood at a seemingly idyllic English boarding school. As they grow into young adults, they find that they have to come to terms with the strength of the love they feel for each other, while preparing themselves for the haunting reality that awaits them. Without wanting to spoil the film, it is made clear from very early on the twist which means that for the three main characters there will be no happy ending- they have been produced to provide donor organs for transplants, and will die before they can fulfil their potential. It is essentially a sci-fi movie dressed up around a romance.
The film is by all accounts a very graceful and faithful adaptation, which is dealt with in a poignant way. The spirit of the novel is captured well, but in a sense this is part of the problem for many viewers, who will not have read Ishiguro’s work beforehand. One aspect which does stand out is the excellent contrast between the stunning landscapes and panoramas compared with the bleak and monochrome colours- visually it is a thing of beauty.
Garfield, having produced a great performance in ‘The Social Network’ again demonstrates his considerable acting talent and outshines his two more experienced co-stars. Keira Knightley is perhaps the weakest of the three main leads, and this is far from her best performance. The three child actors who take up the story for the first thirty minutes all excel and look to have big futures in the industry, and set the tone well for the final two thirds when Mulligan and co. take the lead.
This is a film which does require a lot of thinking about, as the secrets and details are revealed slowly but surely. What’s missing is a spark of life or a jolt of the unexpected — something beyond tears — to puncture the falseness of a film world, which obscures the tragedy that the three characters, by their nature, cannot express.
Verdict: An altogether unsatisfying experience, which raises more questions than it answers.
16 February 2011
Die Hard by James Turnbull
Die Hard (1988)
Rating: 5/5.
Celebrated as one of the greatest action films of all time, most people are familiar with the phenomenal success of the cult Christmas blockbuster, Die Hard. John McClane is a New York City cop who just wants to spend Christmas with his family in Los Angeles. Upon arrival he gets pulled into a terrorist takeover at his wife’s office Christmas party, and must fight for everyone’s survival, aided by the outside help of L.A. cop Sgt. Powell.
The film serves not only as possible career defining performances for Willis (John McClane), and Rickman, who made his feature film debut as the brilliant Hans Gruber, but also for director John McTiernan, who has several notable titles to his name. Bonnie Bedelia, Reginald Veljohnson, and Paul Gleeson star amongst others, in a finely chosen cast.
Despite the 80s hair and clothes, and a few minor hiccoughs, Die Hard remains as exciting, eccentric, and entertaining as it did 20 years ago.
McTiernan does a fantastic job in achieving a perfect balance between thrilling action, hilarious dialogue, and developing some fantastic relationships, which make the audience really care about the characters. It is set aside from the usual high budget low quality action films by the cleverly but subtly layered plot, which will keep you gripped to the screen for the whole 2 hours. We want to see how the events that take place will affect the character’s relationships, and despite McClane and Sgt. Powell having never met, it feels as if they’re lifelong friends.
Visually and technically the film is still as hard hitting as it was upon its release. The sound and special effects and stunning, and coupled with masterful camera work, there are no complaints at all. Whilst the storyline isn’t a masterpiece in realism, it is plausible and doesn’t take away from the experience.
Die Hard is a landmark in movie making, and if you haven’t already seen it, you’re missing out. Packed full of amazing characters, hilarious dialogue, explosive action, and some kind of festive cheer, Die Hard is the ultimate action film.
Rating: 5/5.
Celebrated as one of the greatest action films of all time, most people are familiar with the phenomenal success of the cult Christmas blockbuster, Die Hard. John McClane is a New York City cop who just wants to spend Christmas with his family in Los Angeles. Upon arrival he gets pulled into a terrorist takeover at his wife’s office Christmas party, and must fight for everyone’s survival, aided by the outside help of L.A. cop Sgt. Powell.
The film serves not only as possible career defining performances for Willis (John McClane), and Rickman, who made his feature film debut as the brilliant Hans Gruber, but also for director John McTiernan, who has several notable titles to his name. Bonnie Bedelia, Reginald Veljohnson, and Paul Gleeson star amongst others, in a finely chosen cast.
Despite the 80s hair and clothes, and a few minor hiccoughs, Die Hard remains as exciting, eccentric, and entertaining as it did 20 years ago.
McTiernan does a fantastic job in achieving a perfect balance between thrilling action, hilarious dialogue, and developing some fantastic relationships, which make the audience really care about the characters. It is set aside from the usual high budget low quality action films by the cleverly but subtly layered plot, which will keep you gripped to the screen for the whole 2 hours. We want to see how the events that take place will affect the character’s relationships, and despite McClane and Sgt. Powell having never met, it feels as if they’re lifelong friends.
Visually and technically the film is still as hard hitting as it was upon its release. The sound and special effects and stunning, and coupled with masterful camera work, there are no complaints at all. Whilst the storyline isn’t a masterpiece in realism, it is plausible and doesn’t take away from the experience.
Die Hard is a landmark in movie making, and if you haven’t already seen it, you’re missing out. Packed full of amazing characters, hilarious dialogue, explosive action, and some kind of festive cheer, Die Hard is the ultimate action film.
An Ordinary Excecution by Jessica Cree
Director: Marc Dugain
Duration: 105mins
Rating: ***
On one of the snowiest nights of the winter so far, I was looking forward to a night out at the Tyneside Cinema. I wasn’t expecting a heart-warming story with a title like An Ordinary Execution, but what I did get was a thought-provoking, if somewhat farfetched, imaginative fairytale.
An Ordinary Execution is French author-turned-director Marc Dugain’s debut film, based on the final weeks of Joseph Stalin’s paranoid life and dictatorship. An incredibly gifted young doctor, Anna (Marina Hands), is rumoured by her patients and colleagues to have healing powers and is summoned by the ever weakening Stalin (André Dussollier) to ease his pain. He forbids her to tell anyone about her new post, which puts strain on her relationship with her husband. The film follows the kind and caring Anna’s struggle to obey a notoriously unforgiving dictator’s wishes, whilst protecting her family at the same time.
Dugain’s direction of the film reflects the sinister atmosphere of the era; the film is shot in grey and brown undertones and the whispered discussions heighten the tension. Hands plays the part of Anna well, showing her passion, strength and intelligence, whilst also giving the viewer an insight into her vulnerability; she personifies a ray of hope and good within a corrupt regime.
An Ordinary Execution is a different, more imaginative look at the end of Stalin’s life and however fictional and fantastic the storyline may be, it is well worth viewing simply for the cast’s great performances.
Duration: 105mins
Rating: ***
On one of the snowiest nights of the winter so far, I was looking forward to a night out at the Tyneside Cinema. I wasn’t expecting a heart-warming story with a title like An Ordinary Execution, but what I did get was a thought-provoking, if somewhat farfetched, imaginative fairytale.
An Ordinary Execution is French author-turned-director Marc Dugain’s debut film, based on the final weeks of Joseph Stalin’s paranoid life and dictatorship. An incredibly gifted young doctor, Anna (Marina Hands), is rumoured by her patients and colleagues to have healing powers and is summoned by the ever weakening Stalin (André Dussollier) to ease his pain. He forbids her to tell anyone about her new post, which puts strain on her relationship with her husband. The film follows the kind and caring Anna’s struggle to obey a notoriously unforgiving dictator’s wishes, whilst protecting her family at the same time.
Dugain’s direction of the film reflects the sinister atmosphere of the era; the film is shot in grey and brown undertones and the whispered discussions heighten the tension. Hands plays the part of Anna well, showing her passion, strength and intelligence, whilst also giving the viewer an insight into her vulnerability; she personifies a ray of hope and good within a corrupt regime.
An Ordinary Execution is a different, more imaginative look at the end of Stalin’s life and however fictional and fantastic the storyline may be, it is well worth viewing simply for the cast’s great performances.
Rare Exports: A Christmas Tale by Jessica Cree
Director: Jalmari Helander
Duration: 77mins
Rating: ***
“The real Santa is something different. The Coca-Cola Santa is just a hoax”
Rare Exports is a rather different, darker take on the sickly sweet Christmas stories we are all used to seeing at this time of year. For some, this film could be regarded as a welcomed breath of fresh air, whilst for others, simply as an oddity.
Set in Finland, the film follows Pietari (Onni Tommila) and his teddy bear, Vuppe’s quest to discover the truth about Father Christmas. American excavation company, Subzero Inc., has been brought in to dig into a mountain close to Pietari’s house, where he and his father herd reindeer. Little do they know, however, that the real Santa is buried deep within the mountain, and he may not be exactly what is said on the tin.
This film is actually quite terrifying in parts; the elves have a remarkable resemblance to the Child Catcher from Chitty Chitty Bang Bang and the dolls that replace the stolen children are straight out of a horror film. Yet Rare Exports keeps a little bit of Christmas magic and there are even laugh-out-loud scenes.
So, have you been naughty or nice this year? Because Santa, whoever he may be, is on his way.
Duration: 77mins
Rating: ***
“The real Santa is something different. The Coca-Cola Santa is just a hoax”
Rare Exports is a rather different, darker take on the sickly sweet Christmas stories we are all used to seeing at this time of year. For some, this film could be regarded as a welcomed breath of fresh air, whilst for others, simply as an oddity.
Set in Finland, the film follows Pietari (Onni Tommila) and his teddy bear, Vuppe’s quest to discover the truth about Father Christmas. American excavation company, Subzero Inc., has been brought in to dig into a mountain close to Pietari’s house, where he and his father herd reindeer. Little do they know, however, that the real Santa is buried deep within the mountain, and he may not be exactly what is said on the tin.
This film is actually quite terrifying in parts; the elves have a remarkable resemblance to the Child Catcher from Chitty Chitty Bang Bang and the dolls that replace the stolen children are straight out of a horror film. Yet Rare Exports keeps a little bit of Christmas magic and there are even laugh-out-loud scenes.
So, have you been naughty or nice this year? Because Santa, whoever he may be, is on his way.
15 February 2011
Black Swan by Jessica Cree
Director: Darren Aronofsky
Duration: 108mins
Rating: ****
I think I’m still in shock after watching this film. I’ve seen ‘Swan Lake’ plenty of times, but nothing compares to Aronofsky’s adaptation of one of the world’s most famous ballets.
Nina (Natalie Portman) is a ballerina with a troupe in New York looking to revamp ‘Swan Lake’ and cause a stir within the ballet world with its unorthodox version of the classic. Nina has strived for years to be noticed by French ballet master Thomas Leroy (Vincent Cassel) and gets her opportunity when former prima, Beth (Winona Ryder), becomes too old to cope with the role and a fresh new face is needed. Nina is perfect for the part of the White Swan, with her innocent, accurate style of dancing. However, the Black Swan is a much more sensual, seductive and passionate character; a role her rival, Lily (Mila Kunis), is much more suited to. Nina sees Lily as a threat and starts to hallucinate. She becomes paranoid that she is trying to take the part from her and begins to have psychotic episodes. Attempting to turn herself into the Black Swan, Nina tries some of the outrageous antics that she had never previously had the confidence to do. Warning! There are some scenes here that you definitely would not want to watch with your grandma!
There are a few particularly noteworthy sequences, which will stick with me for a while. Nina has a tendency to scratch herself and on discovering that her daughter has reverted to her old nervous habit, her mother furiously cuts her nails – I won’t be using nail scissors for some time to come! The scene, where Nina starts to pull feathers out of her back, has also been engrained into my memory.
On the whole, I really enjoyed this film. It’s nice to see a dance movie that actually has a great storyline– it’s no ‘Step Up’ or ‘Center Stage’! I also appreciated the training that Portman and Kunis have put in, having worked their technique for over six months, and couldn’t tell that they were amateur ballerinas. I’m not sure about the age 15 rating, but the artistic approach of the more risqué scenes perhaps validates this. As a massive ballet fan, I was worried that ‘Black Swan’ may not live up to the masterpiece that is ‘Swan Lake’. But I was proven wrong – it’s different and quite daring, but I’m so pleased that ballet is being seen as a more modern, main-stream art.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
